Wednesday, July 6, 2016

THE BAD REVIEWS WHEN YOU DON’T KNOW ALL THE ELEMENTS

The Hollywood industry has a long track from the first day that a silent film aired, has had an incredible evolution in all aspects of film, visual effects, sound effects, lighting, soundtrack composition, direction, script complexity, etc. The film began to have its peaks in the 90’s, not only for the appearance of improved special effects but rather that great combination and balance between solid narrative storylines and visual effects that helped to provide a better show on the big screen. However the film industry has had a slight decrease in the XXI century, since the abuse of special effects took over the screen and these unique and exciting plots that we were used to see in the 90’s were now off the scenario. The films of the 2000’s have become a routine in which the purpose of making movies is just profit, and turning them into what we would call today "commercial films" or "consumer films."

Nevertheless, these critics are also mentioned for many films that have script elements quite well crafted, and prejudgment has spread to the point that whenever any movie with great visual effects is released the critics quickly dart to criticize their "poor plots" without even realizing that their frames hide very interesting elements that represent an idea beyond what their blind eyes can appreciate. The same has happened on television. For instance, The TV Series "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" was criticized by referring only to the extreme violence and explicit sex in addition to the excessive use of blood. Many who believe the "know" about film say it it’s an empty set with no arguments. Someone who really understands everything that involves filmmaking can realize that Spartacus is not about violence, blood and sex; it’s a very good representation of roman society during the times of the Republic, and its Executive Producer and creator Steven S. DeKnight knew that very well. The sexual abuse of slaves, power games to reach political positions, excessive violence, the Roman lust, all part of a reality of the roman society at the time. In addition, a remarkable achievement in battle choreography and costume design was accomplished. Spartacus saga is certainly a very well made piece of work and interesting to see if you get to capture its essence.

Another great example of remarkable work with some obvious-to-expect reviews was “Transformers” (2007). Among some of the reviews, characters that were not well connected to the action scenes, or that the robots seemed to be “supporting characters”. And of course some other typical ones came up: “just a movie with good visual effects”. It is true in part that the movie has some unsatisfactory elements regarding the characters and their veracity, especially the story with the two teenagers Sam and Mikaela. However, the movie is a master piece from the production point of view; from pre-production in the robots design though the post-production in visual and sound effects. The dedication that Michael Bay (with the original idea brought by Steven Spielberg) put in designing every single detail of the robots, the metal pieces that formed part of their bodies, their heads, thorax, abdomen and extremities. The eyes were designed to dilate and light up, Bumblebee’s cheeks were made to simulate a smile, and Ironhide’s guns were formed by 10 thousand parts, even the body spins required several visible parts. According Bay, the visual effects were so complex that required 38 hours approximately to get one frame motion. . In addition to this, the movie has great opening scenes, the first time there is a hint of the existence of the robots with the attack at the US military base in Qatar, and then when all of them introduce to Sam Witwicky and transform into vehicles before him for the first time, all that accompanied by a great soundtrack. The incorporation of the army and the Pentagon adds a more credible outcome of the events to ensure this is not just a kid with his car.

Films are something you cannot judge only by their plot or screenplay, not only for their special effects either, films represent a whole. A good rating for a film should always be like a GPA (grade point average). It’s like schools and college, the final grade you’ll get by the end of subject is GPA. A movie could have got a C- in Plot, but a A+ in costume design, cinematography, and direction. Many critics sometimes don’t appreciate the labor of other roles and how hard is to achieve things such as credible visual effects that are note “easy peasy”.